分类 报名通知 报考指南 考试培训 准考证.证书 成绩查询 模拟试题 政策资讯 会计实操 继续教育

雅思阅读实战训练((十五)

 

★Seeking an energy holy trinity
  Jan 10th 2007
  From Economist.com
  1 NEELIE KROES, the European Union's competition commissioner, did not mince her words when reporting on Europe's energy markets on Wednesday January 10th. Europe's energy firms have failed to invest in networks and so customers are suffering. Those “vertically integrated” energy companies such as Electricité de France (EDF) or Germany's E.ON, widely dubbed as “national champions”, are effectively behaving like local monopolies. Shy of competition, eager for artificially high prices, they are helping to block the efficient generation, transmission and distribution of energy on the continent.
  2 Energy prices vary wildly across Europe. Ms Kroes wants to see cheaper energy, and intends to push suppliers to divest their distribution network and to get them to invest more in transportation systems so that more energy—in the form of gas, or electricity, for example—can flow easily over borders. It is remarkably hard, for example, for gas-poor Germany to import from the neighbouring, gas-rich Netherlands. Companies that dominate national markets have, so far, had little interest in improving the interconnections which would mean lower prices for consumers across the continent.
  3 Ms Kroes, of course, will struggle to get her way. The European Commission, which on the same day presented its recommendation for improving EU energy policy, also wants to see the unbundling of ownership, the legal separation of energy suppliers and transporters, something that the integrated energy companies and interested governments, notably in France and Germany, are bound to oppose ferociously.
  4 Complicating the matter is an argument over the security of energy supply in Europe. Much has been made of the risk for western Europe of depending too heavily on Russian exports of gas. Russia under Vladimir Putin is prone to using energy exports as a blunt tool of foreign policy, especially when trying to bully countries in its hinterland. Last year Russia interrupted gas deliveries to Ukraine, affecting supplies in central and western Europe too. This week it blocked oil exports passing via Belarus to Europe, though that spat was soon resolved.
  5 The risk is that concerns about security of supply may be used spuriously by those in Europe who oppose the sort of liberalisation encouraged by Ms Kroes. The likes of E.ON and EDF may claim that only protected national champions are able to secure supply, by striking long-term deals with powerful foreign suppliers. The Commission disagrees. Such deals are too often politically motivated and far from transparent. Protection has been tried for long enough and evidently has not worked for the internal market, nor have these companies secured the best deals for consumers from the Russians.
  6 In contrast, the Commission's new policy proposes, ideally, a break-up of these companies into suppliers and distributors. (As a second best solution, especially for France and Germany, it recommends the management of the networks by a third party.) Properly independent managers of Europe's energy networks would have a strong incentive to build interconnecting pipelines and power lines across borders. For the gas market another means of ensuring competition and security would be finding a more diverse range of suppliers, for example by building more terminals for the import of liquified natural gas. It would also be likely to mean lower prices, if the example of liberalised Britain over the past ten years is anything to go by.
  7 Whether any of this is likely to happen soon, however, is another matter. The Commission is also calling for European governments to agree on a common effort to reduce carbon emissions by at least 20% by 2020 (compared with 1990 levels). If America is willing to play ball, the Commission proposes to reduce emissions by as much as 30%. Achieving either target would mean promoting cleaner cars, a more effective emissions-trading system for Europe, wider use of public transport and a sharp increase in the use of renewable sources of energy, like wind and solar power. All that is laudable enough, but will also require political horse-trading as governments—Europe's leaders are due to meet in March to discuss the various energy proposals—try to avoid commitments that may hurt domestic energy companies or make European firms less competitive than rivals in America, Asia and elsewhere.
  (689 words)
  Questions 1-5
  Do the following statements reflect the views of the writer in the reading passage?
  In boxes 1-5 on your answer sheet write
  YES if the statement reflects the views of the writer
  NO if the statement contradicts the views of the writer
  NOT GIVEN if there is no information about this in the passage
  1.Europe's energy companies have funded the construction of the distribution network.
  2.There has been a wide range of energy prices within Europe.
  3.Gas-poor Germany has to pay a price higher than average to import gas from its neighbour.
  4.E.ON and EDF may oppose the liberalisation due to their concerns about the security of energy supply.
  5.The European Commission proposes to reduce carbon emissions by 30% if the U.S. is willing to cut its.
  Questions 6-10 
  Look at the box of countries below. 
  Choose One or Two countries to complete the following sentences. 
  Write your answers in boxes 6-10 on your answer sheet. 
  Countries 
  A. Belarus 
  B. Britain 
  C. France 
  D. Germany 
  E. Russia 
  F. Ukraine 
  G. The U.S. 
  6. It's dangerous for western Europe to depend too much on gas imports from …… 
  7. A liberalised policy of energy supply was enforced over ten years in … 
  8. Last year energy supplies in central and western Europe was affected owing to the interruption of gas deliveries to … 
  9. The governments in …… are bound to oppose the separation of energy suppliers and transporters? 
  10. Oil exports passing via … to Europe was blocked this week. 
  Questions 11-14 
  Choose NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from the reading passage above for each answer. 
  Write your answers in boxes 11-14. 
  11. The EC disagrees with energy firms to strike long-term deals with foreign suppliers because such deals are usually far from … 
  12. The EC proposes to split those “national champions” into … 
  13. A more diverse range of suppliers would guarantee …in the European gas market.
  14. The realization of carbon emissions reduction would require the promotion of cleaner cars,a better emissions-trading system,wider use of public transport and more use of … of energy. 
  Key and Explanations: 
  1. No 
  See para.1: Europe's energy firms have failed to invest in networks… 
  2. Yes 
  See para.2: Energy prices vary wildly across Europe. 
  3. Not Given 
  See para.2: It is remarkably hard,for example,for gas-poor Germany to import from the neighbouring,gas-rich Netherlands. 
  4. No 
  See para.5: The risk is that concerns about security of supply may be used spuriously by those in Europe who oppose the sort of liberalisation encouraged by Ms Kroes. The likes of E.ON and EDF may claim that… 
  5. Yes 
  See para.7: If America is willing to play ball,the Commission proposes to reduce emissions by as much as 30%. 
  6. E 
  See para.4: Much has been made of the risk for western Europe of depending too heavily on Russian exports of gas. 
  7. B 
  See para.6: It would also be likely to mean lower prices,if the example of liberalised Britain over the past ten years is anything to go by. 
  8. F 
  See para.4: Last year Russia interrupted gas deliveries to Ukraine,affecting supplies in central and western Europe too. 
  9. C,D 
  See para.3: …the legal separation of energy suppliers and transporters,something that the integrated energy companies and interested governments,notably in France and Germany,are bound to oppose ferociously. 
  10. A 
  See para.4: This week it blocked oil exports passing via Belarus to Europe,though that spat was soon resolved. 
  11. transparent 
  See para.5: by striking long-term deals with powerful foreign suppliers. The Commission disagrees. Such deals are too often politically motivated and far from transparent. 
  12. suppliers and distributors 
  See the sentences in para.1 (Those “vertically integrated” energy companies such as Electricité de France (EDF) or Germany's E.ON,widely dubbed as “national champions”…) and para.6 (…the Commission's new policy proposes,ideally,a break-up of these companies into suppliers and distributors.) 
  13. competition and security 
  See para.6: For the gas market another means of ensuring competition and security would be finding a more diverse range of suppliers… 
  14. renewable sources 
  See para.7: Achieving either target would mean promoting cleaner cars,a more effective emissions-trading system for Europe,wider use of public transport and a sharp increase in the use of renewable sources of energy…


   >>学课在线网课试听.报名        >>学课在线智能题库.模拟做题       >>直播课程       >>录播课程

课程名称
课程免费试听
课程名称
课程免费试听
课程名称
课程免费试听
初级会计师

一级建造师

执业药师

中级会计师

二级建造师

护士资格证

注册会计师

一级造价工程师

健康管理师

经济师考试

监理工程师

考研辅导课

银行从业

安全工程师

自考课程

基金从业

一级消防工程师

心理咨询师

企业人力资源管理师

法律职业资格考试

公共营养师

社会工作者

消防设施操作员

保育员

教师资格证

成人高考

育婴师

公务员培训

文职培训

英语四六级

计算机软考
养老护理员
税务师培训

房产经纪人
咨询工程师

其它课程>>



重要提醒!!内容中联系方式并非本站联系方式,报名咨询的学员请与下面最新联系方式联系我们咨询报名-以免损失!
>>长期招聘兼职招生代理人员,项目合作,团报优惠咨询,有意者请联系我们 >>咨询:13312524700(可加微信)。

昆明学历中心:◆咨询电话:0871-65385921、13312528471 赖老师、钱老师(微信报名:17787865775)点击这里给我发消息


云南地州中心:◆咨询电话:0871-65385921、17787865775 冯老师、 王老师(微信报名:17787865775)点击这里给我发消息


总部报名地址: ◆昆明市-五华区教场东路莲花财富中心10楼;网课试听:ke.xuekaocn.cn   点击这里立即咨询我们



地州分校:   大理分校   丽江分校   迪庆分校   怒江分校   红河分校   临沧分校   玉溪分校   文山分校   保山分校   德宏分校   昭通分校   普洱分校   版纳分校 【各地州学员请加老师微信咨询报名,电话(微信):133-1252-4700】;2021年云南省成人高考>>立即报名



职业技能考证:心理咨询师、健康管理师、茶艺师等更多>◆咨询电话:133 1252 4700(微信)点击这里咨询我们  

公考培训咨询:◆国考云南省考公务员/事业单位面授培训,咨询电话:133 1252 4700 (微信)点击这里立即咨询我们






温馨提示:因考试政策、内容不断变化与调整,学课在线网提供的以上信息仅供参考,如有异议,请考生以权威部门公布的内容为准!

免责声明:以上内容仅代表原创者观点,其内容未经本站证实,学课在线网对以上内容的真实性、完整性不作任何保证或承诺,转载目的在于传递更多信息,由此产生的后果与学课在线网无关;如以上转载内容不慎侵犯了您的权益,请联系我们QQ:1536696595,我们将会及时处理。




网友评论